Understanding Mis-Sold Car Finance: Risks of PCP Agreements

Understanding Mis-Sold PCP Car Finance: The Risks of PCP Agreements

a young woman trying to understand PCP car finance

Car finance should be straightforward, but mis-selling occurs when hidden fees lurk in the fine print, interest rates shift like shadows, and commissions remain undisclosed, leaving customers in the dark about what they’re paying. 

Mis-sold PCP car finance happens when a customer enters into agreements without knowing clearly or being informed correctly about the terms and costs involved. Instances involved in a mis-selling can include hidden fees, undisclosed commissions, misleading sales tactics, and unclear interest rates. 

Among the various car finance options available, Personal Contract Purchase (PCP ) agreements have become the most popular choice. Still, it has also emerged as one of the most commonly mis-sold car finance, brought about by its complex structure and the additional conditions it usually comes with. However, the mis-selling scenarios in PCP agreements are more distinct than those in other car financing options. Unlike straightforward finance agreements such as in a Hire Purchase (HP), with PCP, multiple financial components may seem difficult to any consumer. 

Customers usually misunderstand the structure of PCP agreements. Some sales representatives are not able to provide complete disclosure of all the elements and explain correctly terms like balloon payments, mileage restrictions, and variable residual values. There are also instances where dealers push customers into rolling over into new PCP deals rather than explain more financially suitable alternatives, which then results in a cycle of perpetual financing. 

Mis-sold PCP agreements leave consumers trapped. Some are put into financially burdensome deals, while others struggle to settle end-of-contract payments. Inflated interest rates are also very common, which is why it’s best to understand the intricacies of PCP  mis-selling to avoid being victim to these unfair practices. 

What is PCP Car Finance?

When looking for car financing, customers are presented with multiple options, mainly Personal Contract Purchase (PCP), Hire Purchase (HP), or Leasing. All options offer installment deals, spreading the cost over an agreed-upon period of time. However, it all differs significantly in terms of payment structure, ownership, and flexibility. 

PCP is often marketed as the affordable option because it has lower monthly payments because you only pay for the depreciation value. But there is a balloon payment that you have to consider should you decide to own the car after the agreement. HP, on the other hand, has higher monthly payments because you have a path to ownership. 

Compared to HP agreements, here are distinct factors you can only observe in a PCP:

  1. Balloon Payments – Unlike HP agreements, where you pay for the full cost of the car, as it is spread over a finance term, PCP agreements will require a large final payment called a balloon payment if you choose to keep the car. It is also the Guaranteed Minimum Future Value (GMFV), which is the cost estimate of the car at the end of the contract and is usually a value given by the lender. But also know that while these estimated values won’t change over time, they can be inaccurate as well, leaving you with a high value to pay or negative equity upon market changes. 
  2. Mileage Caps – PCP agreements have mileage limits, which range from 6,000 to 12,000 miles per year. This value will depend on your lender and your negotiation. When you exceed this number, it can result in penalties that significantly increase the costs of your agreements. If you’re buying a car through PCP agreements, you should know this specific restriction to avoid being misled. It's also important to give a realistic mileage value so you will be advised of your options. 
  3. Residual Value –  The final payment will be determined through your car’s projected residual value, so if the market value becomes lower than expected, then consumers may be faced with unexpected shortfalls and struggle to trade in their vehicle without suffering any financial loss.

These are unique factors and elements that make PCP agreements more susceptible to mis-selling because customers do not fully understand the long-term implications of these financial decisions. 

Some dealers would often emphasise low monthly payments without explaining correctly or thoroughly the full costs that are involved, which then leads to financial strain on the consumer’s end. Reading on FAQs on PCP claims can help you understand the important details about the process and what to look out for when dealing with mis-sold car finance agreements.

Common PCP Mis-Selling Scenarios vs. Other Finance Agreements

There are unique mis-selling risks with PCP agreements that differ from those you would usually find in Hire Purchase (HP) and leasing agreements brought about by its complex structure, reliance on residual values, and dealership incentives. 

Here, we will elaborate on the different mis-selling issues on PCP, HP, and leasing. 

PCP -Specific Mis-Selling Issues

  1. Undisclosed Commissions – There are customers who are unaware that their dealers and brokers received commissions from their lenders. These commissions can lead to inflated interest rates and biased financing recommendations, affecting the consumers negatively. Issues like this are particularly problematic, especially in PCP agreements, where commissions are linked to higher interest rates or even longer terms. 
  2. Unrealistic Mileage Limits – PCP contracts have strict mileage caps, and it’s one of the only two financing options with this specific mis-selling issue. Exceeding the mileage cap will result in hefty penalties, which can make the deal even more expensive than it’s supposed to be. Most customers who file claims aren’t aware of the mileage limits or were not properly informed of the financial consequences of exceeding the agreed mileage. 
  3. Unclear Balloon Payments – Some customers are led to believe that they have the right of ownership after the contract has ended. However, this can be misleading, as a consumer will be required to pay a balloon payment or the final lump sum (Guaranteed Future Value) to acquire ownership. Costs that aren’t explained properly can lead to financial strains on the customer’s end. 
  4. Residual Value Risks – While your lender is the one who will give an estimate of your GFV, there’s still a risk that the car’s actual market value drops below the predicted amount. This may then leave you in negative equity, which then keeps you stuck in limited refinancing options. 
Mis-selling Risks in Other Finance Agreements

Hire Purchase (HP)

  1. Hidden Interest Rates - There are customers who are offered HP deals without being told the true cost of borrowing, as interest rates are often buried in the complex contract terms. 
  2. Lack of affordability checks – PCP deals focus on affordability based on monthly payments, while HP agreements require higher fixed installments, and some lenders fail to assess properly whether customers can afford these repayment terms. 
  3. Early Settlement Penalties – Like PCP, HP agreements have penalties for early repayment, but more often, mis-sold cases arise because it wasn’t disclosed at the point of the sale. 

Leasing (PCH – Personal Contract Hire)
  1. Strict Return Conditions—Most customers who lease their cars aren’t fully informed of the wear-and-tear policies or at least what the lender meant by this term, which leads to unexpected charges once they return their cars. 
  2. Hidden fees and excess charges – There are leasing agreements that include administrative fees and excess mileage penalties, which are the same as PCP agreements. If not clearly outlined upfront, this can cause an issue of mis-selling. 

While HP and leasing mis-selling commonly revolve around hidden costs, unclear interest rates, and affordability checks, there are PCP-specific risks that are largely tied to and relevant to undisclosed commissions, mileage restrictions, and financing pressure. PCP agreements are more complex than these two other financing options, making them susceptible to mis-selling, especially when customers aren’t fully aware of their end-of-term obligations.

In addition, here’s an example. A customer on a PCP deal was sold a contract with a low mileage cap of 6,000 miles per year despite informing the dealer that they regularly drove 15,000 miles annually. At the end of the agreement, they faced excessive mileage penalties that had not been clearly explained at the outset.

How to Claim PCP: How PCP Claims Are Handled Differently

Making a Personal Contract Purchase (PCP) mis-selling claim is not like how you do it in other car finance claims. It’s much more complex, brought about by commissions and its unique financial structure. Apart from learning how to claim PCP, you should also know how it is different from the other two financing options. 

Hire Purchase and Leasing Claims are focused on issues such as affordability checks and hidden fees. But what is a PCP claim? A PCP claim is a complaint that’s often about additional evidence related to commission disclosure, unrealistic mileage limits, and misrepresentation of the balloon payment. 

1. Evidence Required

PCP Claims: Customers should be able to provide the loan agreements, proof of undisclosed commissions or misleading information, and any form of dealership communication; any other information regarding mileage limits and balloon payments should also be disclosed. The Financial Ombudsman (FOS) will often look into your contract to check if there were undisclosed commissions or if it led to a higher-cost loan. 

HP & Leasing Claims: In claims like these, the evidence includes the loan term, payment history, and affordability assessment. Here, it's important to prove that the agreement was mis-sold brought about by unfair interest rates and inadequate credit checks. 

2. Claim Eligibility

PCP Claims: You can consider claims valid in a PCP agreement if:

  • The customer was not informed about the dealer’s commissions, which then led to an increased interest rate.
  • The buyer was misled about the final balloon payment and instead thought that they would have ownership of the car outright.
  • The dealer did not correctly explain the mileage limits and their scope, which resulted in hefty penalties for the buyer.
  • The buyer was pressured into refinancing rather than paying the balloon payment in full, trapping them in a cycle of debt.

HP & Leasing Claims: Claims typically apply if:

  • There were no proper affordability checks, which led to financial hardship for the buyer. 
  • The interest rates and fees were hidden during the signing of the contract.
  • The buyer was charged unfair penalty fees due to early settlement.

3. Compensation Differences

PCP Claims: Compensation can include interest funds, final payment reductions, and contract cancellations, especially when the issue is undisclosed commission. Customers who overpaid due to hidden commissions will be refunded the difference between what they were charged and the fair interest rate. While payouts could last for months, it's important to still make your claim.

HP & Leasing Claims: Compensation usually involves interest and fee refunds or removal of unfair charges. Since ownership is the goal in HP, claims rarely involve balloon payments or residual value disputes, unlike PCP cases.

Key Differences in Handling PCP vs. Other Claims

PCP mis-selling claims require more detailed scrutiny of dealer-lender relationships, commission structures, and end-of-contract obligations, whereas HP and leasing claims mainly focus on loan affordability and contract transparency. The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) and legal claims for PCP often result in higher compensation due to commission-based mis-selling, making them distinct from other finance disputes.

Conclusion

While PCP agreements offer flexibility, they come with risks, which, when not observed well, can lead to mis-selling. Before signing your PCP agreements, it's important that you review your finance agreements carefully and check for any red flags like undisclosed commissions, high final payments, and mileage cap restrictions to protect yourself from mis-selling. If you suspect mis-selling, do not hesitate to seek financial advice and file a claim to uncover those unnecessary costs and rectify the unfair agreement you were sold.

Related Blogs
A Guide to Understanding Discretionary Commission Arrangement in Car Finance

The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) discretionary commission arrangement (DCA) ban resulted in an estimated billion-pound payout from motor industry players like Lloyds and Santander to consumers.

Questions to Ask Before Signing a Car Finance Agreement

Car finance might seem straightforward, but it is important to examine all the details. Many buyers focus only on the monthly payments and overlook hidden costs that can increase the total price. Before signing any agreement, make sure to ask essential questions. This can help you avoid problems. With mis-sold car finance, not knowing all the information can lead to extra expenses.

Reclaim247.co.uk is a trading style of Claimsline Group Ltd, registered in England and Wales, Company registration number 09071409. Registered Office: C/O Burton Varley Ltd, Suite 3, 2nd Floor, Didsbury House, 748 - 754 Wilmslow Road, Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 2DW. VAT registration number 199616255. Registered with the Information Commissioner's Office; registration number ZA059156. You can find our terms of use, privacy policy and our cookie policy here. Claimsline Group Ltd is a claims management company. Any solicitor we recommend you to is an independent professional from whom you will receive impartial and confidential advice. You are free to choose another solicitor. *£5,492.10 is the figure disclosed to Bott & Co Solicitors by Black Horse, *£4,478.46 is the figure disclosed to Bott & Co Solicitors by Motonovo, *£2,449.65 is the figure disclosed to Bott & Co Solicitors by Close Brothers. Claimsline Group Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in respect of regulated claims management activities FRN Number is 831196.