Car finance should be straightforward, but mis-selling occurs when hidden fees lurk in the fine print, interest rates shift like shadows, and commissions remain undisclosed, leaving customers in the dark about what they’re paying.
Mis-sold PCP car finance happens when a customer enters into agreements without knowing clearly or being informed correctly about the terms and costs involved. Instances involved in a mis-selling can include hidden fees, undisclosed commissions, misleading sales tactics, and unclear interest rates.
Among the various car finance options available, Personal Contract Purchase (PCP ) agreements have become the most popular choice. Still, it has also emerged as one of the most commonly mis-sold car finance, brought about by its complex structure and the additional conditions it usually comes with. However, the mis-selling scenarios in PCP agreements are more distinct than those in other car financing options. Unlike straightforward finance agreements such as in a Hire Purchase (HP), with PCP, multiple financial components may seem difficult to any consumer.
Customers usually misunderstand the structure of PCP agreements. Some sales representatives are not able to provide complete disclosure of all the elements and explain correctly terms like balloon payments, mileage restrictions, and variable residual values. There are also instances where dealers push customers into rolling over into new PCP deals rather than explain more financially suitable alternatives, which then results in a cycle of perpetual financing.
Mis-sold PCP agreements leave consumers trapped. Some are put into financially burdensome deals, while others struggle to settle end-of-contract payments. Inflated interest rates are also very common, which is why it’s best to understand the intricacies of PCP mis-selling to avoid being victim to these unfair practices.
When looking for car financing, customers are presented with multiple options, mainly Personal Contract Purchase (PCP), Hire Purchase (HP), or Leasing. All options offer installment deals, spreading the cost over an agreed-upon period of time. However, it all differs significantly in terms of payment structure, ownership, and flexibility.
PCP is often marketed as the affordable option because it has lower monthly payments because you only pay for the depreciation value. But there is a balloon payment that you have to consider should you decide to own the car after the agreement. HP, on the other hand, has higher monthly payments because you have a path to ownership.
Compared to HP agreements, here are distinct factors you can only observe in a PCP:
These are unique factors and elements that make PCP agreements more susceptible to mis-selling because customers do not fully understand the long-term implications of these financial decisions.
Some dealers would often emphasise low monthly payments without explaining correctly or thoroughly the full costs that are involved, which then leads to financial strain on the consumer’s end. Reading on FAQs on PCP claims can help you understand the important details about the process and what to look out for when dealing with mis-sold car finance agreements.
There are unique mis-selling risks with PCP agreements that differ from those you would usually find in Hire Purchase (HP) and leasing agreements brought about by its complex structure, reliance on residual values, and dealership incentives.
Here, we will elaborate on the different mis-selling issues on PCP, HP, and leasing.
While HP and leasing mis-selling commonly revolve around hidden costs, unclear interest rates, and affordability checks, there are PCP-specific risks that are largely tied to and relevant to undisclosed commissions, mileage restrictions, and financing pressure. PCP agreements are more complex than these two other financing options, making them susceptible to mis-selling, especially when customers aren’t fully aware of their end-of-term obligations.
In addition, here’s an example. A customer on a PCP deal was sold a contract with a low mileage cap of 6,000 miles per year despite informing the dealer that they regularly drove 15,000 miles annually. At the end of the agreement, they faced excessive mileage penalties that had not been clearly explained at the outset.
Making a Personal Contract Purchase (PCP) mis-selling claim is not like how you do it in other car finance claims. It’s much more complex, brought about by commissions and its unique financial structure. Apart from learning how to claim PCP, you should also know how it is different from the other two financing options.
Hire Purchase and Leasing Claims are focused on issues such as affordability checks and hidden fees. But what is a PCP claim? A PCP claim is a complaint that’s often about additional evidence related to commission disclosure, unrealistic mileage limits, and misrepresentation of the balloon payment.
PCP Claims: Customers should be able to provide the loan agreements, proof of undisclosed commissions or misleading information, and any form of dealership communication; any other information regarding mileage limits and balloon payments should also be disclosed. The Financial Ombudsman (FOS) will often look into your contract to check if there were undisclosed commissions or if it led to a higher-cost loan.
HP & Leasing Claims: In claims like these, the evidence includes the loan term, payment history, and affordability assessment. Here, it's important to prove that the agreement was mis-sold brought about by unfair interest rates and inadequate credit checks.
PCP Claims: You can consider claims valid in a PCP agreement if:
HP & Leasing Claims: Claims typically apply if:
PCP Claims: Compensation can include interest funds, final payment reductions, and contract cancellations, especially when the issue is undisclosed commission. Customers who overpaid due to hidden commissions will be refunded the difference between what they were charged and the fair interest rate. While payouts could last for months, it's important to still make your claim.
HP & Leasing Claims: Compensation usually involves interest and fee refunds or removal of unfair charges. Since ownership is the goal in HP, claims rarely involve balloon payments or residual value disputes, unlike PCP cases.
PCP mis-selling claims require more detailed scrutiny of dealer-lender relationships, commission structures, and end-of-contract obligations, whereas HP and leasing claims mainly focus on loan affordability and contract transparency. The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) and legal claims for PCP often result in higher compensation due to commission-based mis-selling, making them distinct from other finance disputes.
While PCP agreements offer flexibility, they come with risks, which, when not observed well, can lead to mis-selling. Before signing your PCP agreements, it's important that you review your finance agreements carefully and check for any red flags like undisclosed commissions, high final payments, and mileage cap restrictions to protect yourself from mis-selling. If you suspect mis-selling, do not hesitate to seek financial advice and file a claim to uncover those unnecessary costs and rectify the unfair agreement you were sold.