News 29 May 2025 | Andrew Franks |
Legal experts warn UK consumers might lose up to £1 billion in car finance compensation because banks and lenders deleted necessary customer data. The issue arises amid a significant car finance scandal involving undisclosed commissions paid to car dealers, which could lead to one of the largest redress schemes since the £50 billion Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) payouts.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) began an investigation while ordering firms to stop removing relevant documents. Files covering loans from more than six years ago were removed through regular data retention protocols before the investigation began. The FCA is considering launching a formal compensation scheme, but the absence of critical data may hinder the process of identifying and contacting affected borrowers.
The car finance commission scandal had extensive consequences because lenders made secret payments to dealers, which led to consumers paying more for their loans. The 2024 Court of Appeal verdict found these practices illegal and could expose lenders like Lloyds and Santander to £44 billion in liabilities.
The FCA has stated that any compensation scheme design must focus on being clear and easy to access. The Supreme Court's upcoming decision about commission payment legality will notably affect how future compensation programs will operate and their extent.
The FCA investigates car finance commission practices after enduring multiple years of complaints about transparency issues. In January 2021, the authority banned DCAs after finding brokers were motivated to raise interest rates for additional income without informing consumers.
According to a recent update from the FCA, they will release additional guidance by September 2025 which may feature a redress framework. Financial institutions are required by regulatory authorities to maintain records of affected financial agreements until April 11, 2026.
However, several lenders claim they no longer possess documentation related to older agreements—especially those that are more than six years old. Under the standard UK data retention policy, firms are only required to hold on to such records for a limited period unless legal or regulatory obligations suggest otherwise.
Legal professionals suggest that destroying records following the initiation of an FCA investigation may breach existing obligations. The practice could lead to obstructing justice charges when performed intentionally during ongoing regulatory evaluations, according to some experts.
Pressure is now mounting on lenders to disclose what data remains and whether affected consumers will have any route to redress. Law firms maintain that lenders must provide compensation even without complete documentation when aggregate industry data or historic internal policies reveal evidence of misconduct.
The controversy has also sparked debate about how long financial institutions should be required to retain consumer data. Financial agreements retention policies require most UK firms to follow a six-year timeline according to current legislation.
But campaigners argue that this limit is outdated given the nature of long-term finance contracts. Consumer groups are now calling for tougher penalties and greater scrutiny of how financial institutions manage long-term data.
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has not yet opened an inquiry, but experts believe the issue could fall under its jurisdiction depending on the findings of the FCA. The FCA has yet to confirm whether it will mandate longer data retention going forward, though internal sources say the topic is under active review.
The developing car finance claims crisis has become a focus for claims management companies (CMCs) who have started reaching out to past borrowers. CMCs can help consumers file claims especially for those who missed documentation or did not realise they were deceived. Several legal representatives say they’ve received a surge in inquiries since the court ruling and anticipate further increases once the Supreme Court issues its judgment.
The discretionary commission arrangement (DCA) stands at the centre of the scandal because it allowed dealers to determine interest rates and to gain higher commissions. Regulators maintain that this practice resulted in a clear conflict of interest which caused consumers to end up paying much higher rates for car loans.
The UK motor finance industry suffered substantial damage to its public trust as a result of the car finance scandal. Borrowers found out they had been charged interest rates up to 10.9% APR through DCAs only after they completed the sale.
The FCA implemented a DCA ban starting in January 2021 and existing pre-ban agreements continue to be examined. Industry insiders fear that if widespread compensation is approved, it could drastically alter the car finance landscape and prompt tighter regulation in future agreements.
While many affected consumers may still be eligible to claim a car loan compensation, the road to redress will likely be long and complex. Experts from consumer rights groups recommend affected people to start gathering documents and submit initial complaints because the official compensation process will take several months to establish.
Key steps include:
Even in the absence of direct records, lawyers may be able to argue cases based on industry practices or lender disclosures during the period in question. The coming months are expected to be critical in determining whether car finance firms will be forced to pay out car finance compensation or whether consumers will be left with little recourse due to data loss.
The FCA has committed to deliver additional information before September when it might reveal its strategy for a formal scheme. Consumers tangled in the car finance scandal should remain informed while seeking legal counsel until September.