The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is facing growing pressure as it prepares to finalise a compensation scheme for UK drivers affected by the car finance scandal. The regulator’s public consultation on its proposed redress plan closed on Friday 12 December and drew detailed feedback from lenders, industry groups, consumer organisations and legal experts. The next phase of the process will be critical in shaping how and when drivers who were mis‑sold car finance might be compensated.

This redress plan will assist people who took out car finance between 2007 and 2024, specifically with PCP and HP agreements. Many drivers have raised questions about how these deals were sold, especially where commission arrangements may have increased interest rates without being clearly explained. Those concerns have driven a rise in car finance claims.

Different Views on How Compensation Should Work

Responses to the consultation show that opinions differ widely on how the redress scheme should be structured. Consumer groups want the FCA to make the compensation process as accessible as possible for affected drivers. They say that because commission arrangements were not transparent at the time, many people did not realise they were being mis‑sold car finance. These groups have argued that requiring extensive proof of financial loss could unfairly limit who can make a claim.

Financial institutions have expressed a more cautious view. Lenders have said that if compensation is offered too widely, it could lead to a large number of claims that do not reflect genuine financial harm. They want the scheme to include clear criteria so that payouts are fair and can be managed responsibly. Behind these concerns are questions about how much the scheme will cost and how practical it will be to review thousands of historic agreements.

PCP Claims Still at the Heart of the Issue

From 2007 to 2024, PCP agreements were one of the most common ways to finance a vehicle in the UK. These deals were often presented as flexible and affordable, with lower monthly payments that appealed to many drivers.

Investigations into the car finance scandal have shown that some drivers were not told that commissions to brokers or dealers could influence the interest rate they were offered. As a result, what appeared to be a straightforward finance deal may have cost some customers more than they realised.

That lack of clarity has driven a significant increase in car finance claims. Now drivers want to know who can expect compensation, what documents they will need to produce and when they might hear back from the government. Such practical details are central to discussions about how to design the redress scheme.

Challenges in Reviewing Older Agreements

While the goal of the redress scheme is to address past issues, there are real questions about how it will work in practice. Many of the car finance agreements now being looked at go back more than ten years. That can make it hard for drivers to find paperwork or recall the details of the deal they signed up to.

Lenders have said they expect it to be a complicated process. Some of the records they need may no longer exist, and tracking down others could take time. At this stage, it is also unclear how much evidence drivers will be asked to provide or how long it will take to assess each claim.

Consumer groups have warned that a claims process that feels too complex or slow could put people off from coming forward at all. They are urging the FCA to design the system in a way that is easy to understand and navigate. There are simple online tools that let drivers see if they might be eligible for compensation and give a rough idea of what they might be entitled to. More people could find out where they stand and decide whether to file a claim with clear instructions and user-friendly resources.

Final Scheme Expected in 2026

The FCA has said it plans to publish its final policy statement and implementation plan in the first half of 2026. This document will outline the key details of the redress scheme, including who can claim, how compensation will be calculated and when payouts might begin.

In the meantime, drivers who think they may have been affected by mis‑sold car finance are being encouraged to review their agreements. PCP claims make up the majority of cases so far, but other types of car finance could also be included if undisclosed commission arrangements influenced the terms of the deal. Taking time to locate old paperwork and understand the details of past agreements may help people prepare ahead of the final decision.

The potential scale and cost of the redress scheme have led some to compare it with the long‑running payment protection insurance compensation programme, which eventually resulted in more than £38 billion in payouts. Whether the current redress effort will reach a similar level remains unclear, but it is evident that both consumers and lenders will be affected by the decisions that follow.

Balancing Fairness and Practical Delivery

As the FCA examines the consultation responses and moves towards finalising the redress framework, it must find a balance between fairness for drivers and practical considerations from lenders. Many drivers are now watching closely to see how the regulator will address these competing priorities.

With billions of pounds potentially at stake and implications for the wider motor finance industry, 2026 decisions will be closely watched. Drivers nationwide will want to know how the scheme will work and when they can expect resolution after years of uncertainty.