Guide 9 October 2026 | Shannon Smith O'Connell |

Four-year PCP deals are becoming increasingly visible in new car advertising, offering drivers the attraction of spreading their monthly payments over a longer period.
But is signing up to PCP car finance for 48 months actually a good idea?
Former Lookers chief executive James Brearley recently raised concerns about the motor industry's shift towards longer PCP agreements [1]. Writing about the strength of the UK car market, he said around 65% of advertised PCP offers are now approximately four years long, compared with the 24 to 36-month agreements that have traditionally been common.
For drivers, however, the question is less about what longer agreements mean for dealerships and more about what they mean for their own finances.
A lower-looking monthly payment can be attractive, but the length of a PCP is only one part of the deal. The APR, deposit, balloon payment, mileage allowance, total amount payable and what the car might be worth when the agreement ends all matter too.
Here is what to consider before committing to a four-year PCP.
A four-year PCP is a Personal Contract Purchase agreement lasting approximately 48 months.
PCP allows someone to use a vehicle while making monthly payments over an agreed period. There is normally an upfront deposit followed by monthly payments and an optional final balloon payment if the customer wants to own the car.
The balloon payment is based on an estimate of what the vehicle will be worth at the end of the agreement, often called the Guaranteed Minimum Future Value (GMFV).
At the end of a typical agreement, the customer can usually pay the balloon payment and keep the vehicle, return it subject to the terms of the agreement, or use any available equity towards another vehicle.
MoneyHelper says PCP agreements will usually last between three and five years, so a 48-month agreement is not unusual in itself.
What has attracted attention is the apparent shift towards four-year offers in new car advertising.
Brearley argues that manufacturers have increasingly moved towards longer agreements following the sharp increase in new car prices after the pandemic.
According to his analysis, around 65% of advertised PCP offers are now approximately four years long.
His concern is that the industry has historically relied heavily on shorter 24 to 36-month agreements, which encouraged customers to return to the market sooner.
Moving towards 48 months can help make monthly payments appear more manageable by spreading part of the cost over a longer period.
That does not necessarily make a four-year PCP cheaper overall.
A customer comparing PCP offers should look beyond the monthly figure and examine the complete cost of the agreement.
Not necessarily.
A longer agreement can reduce the amount that needs to be covered by each individual monthly payment, depending on how the deal is structured.
But a lower monthly payment does not automatically mean a lower overall cost.
Interest is an important part of the calculation. MoneyHelper explains that although PCP monthly payments are based partly on the vehicle's value after the deposit and balloon payment have been taken into account, interest is charged on the financed amount [2].
The APR, deposit, manufacturer contribution, GMFV and other terms can all differ between offers.
That means comparing a £350 monthly payment over three years with a £310 payment over four years tells you very little on its own.
Before signing, compare the total amount payable, not just the monthly instalment.
Start with the basic numbers.
How much are you putting down as a deposit? What is the APR? How much will you pay each month? What is the optional final payment? And what is the total amount payable if you decide to buy the vehicle?
The mileage allowance matters as well.
PCP agreements normally specify how many miles the vehicle can cover. Exceeding the agreed allowance can result in additional charges when the vehicle is returned.
A four-year agreement also means thinking further ahead.
Someone driving 8,000 miles a year when they sign could have a very different commute, job or family situation three years later. An annual mileage allowance that looks generous today may not necessarily suit the driver throughout the full 48 months.
The same applies to the vehicle itself. A small car that works for someone's circumstances now may no longer suit them several years later.
A longer PCP means keeping the vehicle for longer, so drivers should consider what running costs could arise later in the agreement.
New vehicles may require relatively little maintenance initially, but tyres, brakes and other wear items will eventually need attention.
Drivers should also check how long the manufacturer's warranty lasts and whether it covers the entire PCP term.
A 48-month agreement on a car with a shorter warranty, for example, could leave the customer responsible for certain repair costs before the finance agreement ends.
Servicing requirements should also be understood from the beginning.
If the vehicle is going to be handed back, its condition will normally be assessed against the finance provider's return standards. Damage beyond acceptable wear and tear may lead to additional charges.
The basic choices are similar to those at the end of a shorter PCP.
You may be able to pay the optional final balloon payment and own the vehicle.
Alternatively, you can return it in accordance with the agreement.
A third possibility is changing to another vehicle. If the car is worth more than the settlement or guaranteed future value relevant to the transaction, there may be equity that can potentially contribute towards the next deal.
But positive equity should never be assumed when signing the original agreement.
Used car values can change considerably over four years. The vehicle's condition and mileage will also affect what it is worth.
This is another reason not to judge a PCP purely by its monthly payment.
Not necessarily, but ending the agreement early is different from simply reaching its scheduled end.
A customer who wants to leave a PCP early can ask the finance provider for an early settlement figure.
There is also a statutory right known as voluntary termination for qualifying regulated hire purchase agreements, including PCP. Broadly, this can allow the customer to terminate after paying at least half of the total amount payable, subject to the relevant conditions.
With PCP, however, the 50% calculation includes the balloon payment. Because that payment can represent a substantial part of the total amount payable, MoneyHelper notes that the voluntary termination point may not be reached until relatively late in the agreement.
Anyone considering ending a PCP early should therefore check their own agreement and ask the finance provider for the relevant figures rather than assuming they can simply hand the vehicle back without further cost.
Signing a 48-month PCP does not necessarily mean the car must stay with you for the full four years.
If your circumstances change, one option is to contact the finance company and find out how much it would cost to settle the agreement early. The amount will depend on your contract and what remains outstanding at that point.
Another route available with qualifying regulated PCP agreements is voluntary termination. This right is linked to the amount paid under the agreement rather than simply the number of months that have passed.
The key figure is 50% of the total amount payable. With PCP, that total includes the large optional final payment. As a result, someone could be well into their agreement before reaching the halfway point financially.
So, if you think you may want to change cars before month 48, check the early-exit position before signing. A deal that looks affordable each month may offer less flexibility than a shorter agreement.
Longer agreements could also change the rhythm of the new car market.
This was one of the issues raised by former Lookers chief executive James Brearley. His concern is that dealerships have traditionally seen many PCP customers return for another vehicle after around two-and-a-half to three years. Stretching more agreements to four years could push that next purchase further into the future.
From a driver's perspective, this raises a practical question rather than a market one.
How long do you genuinely expect to want the same car?
Four years can be a long time if your mileage, commute, income or family circumstances are likely to change. Someone who normally replaces their vehicle after two or three years could find that choosing a 48-month deal for the sake of a smaller monthly payment does not fit their usual buying habits.
Brearley's prediction about the longer-term effect on the market is his view, rather than a certainty. For drivers, the important part is making sure the finance term matches their own plans.
No. The term of the agreement alone does not tell you whether the finance was sold fairly.
A four-year contract is not, on its own, evidence of car finance mis-selling. Nor does it mean someone automatically has mis-sold PCP car finance.
That is an important distinction because current PCP offers can easily become mixed up with discussion of the historic car finance scandal.
The FCA car finance compensation scheme deals with certain historic commission arrangements and the information consumers received about those arrangements. It does not provide compensation simply because a PCP ran for 48 months.
In other words, having a long agreement does not automatically create a PCP claim or car finance claim.
On the other hand, an older agreement would not be excluded merely because it lasted four years. If it falls within the relevant period and meets the scheme's other conditions, it can still be assessed in the same way as other eligible agreements.
Yes, certain PCP agreements can potentially be included.
The FCA scheme covers qualifying motor finance agreements made between 6 April 2007 and 1 November 2024 [3]. Because PCP is a form of hire purchase, some PCP finance claims can fall within its scope.
But the date and type of finance are only starting points.
For a PCP compensation claim, the lender needs to consider what happened when that particular agreement was arranged. The scheme covers specified commission practices, including discretionary commission arrangements, excessive commission and certain tied arrangements.
This is why having PCP car finance during the relevant years does not automatically mean the customer is entitled to compensation.
The same applies to possible mis-sold car finance more broadly. Each agreement has its own circumstances, so eligibility cannot be determined simply from the length of the contract.
You may see phrases such as PCP refund, car finance refund, PCP car claims and car finance claims used online. They are often shorthand for complaints about historic motor finance, but they can make the process sound more automatic than it is.
There is no guaranteed refund simply because somebody previously financed a vehicle.
Similarly, completing a car finance refund check or PCP claim check may help identify an old agreement that could be relevant, but finding the finance is not confirmation that money is owed.
Whether PCP claims qualify for car finance compensation depends on the individual agreement and the rules of the FCA scheme.
Consumers can also approach their lender themselves without paying a representative. Those who prefer assistance can choose a solicitor or an FCA-regulated claims management company, although fees may be charged for professional representation.
Anyone searching for payouts 2026 may come across information based on an earlier timetable.
The position has since changed.
Although the FCA established the Motor Finance Compensation Scheme in March 2026 [4], legal challenges led to parts of its implementation being suspended [5]. The Upper Tribunal hearing is currently expected to take place either in December 2026 or February 2027 [6].
As a result, the earlier expectations around compensation payments should not be relied upon as the current schedule.
This historic compensation process should also be kept separate from decisions about taking out PCP today. The legal proceedings do not determine whether a new 36 or 48-month agreement offers good value for an individual driver.
Instead of starting with the question of which term is better, it can help to compare what each deal will actually cost and how well it fits your plans.
Suppose one offer lasts 36 months and another lasts 48. The four-year option might show a smaller monthly figure, but that does not tell you which is cheaper overall.
Look at the deposit and APR, then compare the total amount payable and optional final payment. Check how much mileage is included and what happens if you exceed it. You should also consider servicing, likely maintenance and whether the manufacturer's warranty lasts for the whole period you expect to have the car.
Think about flexibility too. If you already suspect that your work, family needs or annual mileage could look very different in three years, committing for an additional year deserves consideration.
The comparison should not stop at PCP either. Hire purchase, leasing, a personal loan or buying outright may produce very different costs and ownership outcomes.
The aim is not necessarily to find the smallest monthly number. It is to understand what you will pay, what commitments you are accepting and what choices you will have later.
It can be, but the answer depends on the individual deal and the person taking it out.
A 48-month PCP may suit a driver who is comfortable keeping the same vehicle for four years, stays within the agreed mileage and is satisfied with the overall cost. Someone who expects to change cars sooner may place more value on a shorter commitment.
This is why the monthly payment should be treated as only one number in the decision.
Look at the APR and total amount payable. Understand the final balloon payment and mileage conditions. Think about servicing, warranty coverage and how your circumstances could change before the agreement ends.
It is also important not to confuse those considerations with historic car finance claims. Choosing a four-year term does not by itself amount to car finance mis-selling, just as a 48-month agreement does not automatically create a PCP claim.
A historic agreement may separately qualify for car finance compensation if it meets the FCA's criteria. That assessment concerns how the finance and commission arrangements were handled, not simply whether the customer chose three years or four.
For anyone considering a new PCP, the better test is whether the agreement still looks suitable once you look beyond the headline monthly payment.
_________