News 13 February 2026 | Andrew Franks |

For millions of drivers across the UK, the announcement may feel like a significant moment. Many people who took out car loans or PCP agreements over the past decade are now asking the same question: did I pay more than I should have?
The bank’s decision reflects the growing number of customers reviewing old agreements and exploring whether they may have been affected by mis-sold car finance.
Barclays said it reassessed the likely scale of car finance claims and PCP claims as awareness of car finance mis-selling has grown. What was once a relatively technical issue has become a mainstream consumer concern, with drivers increasingly revisiting paperwork they may not have looked at since the day they collected their keys.
At the centre of the issue are discretionary commission arrangements that were previously common in car loans and personal contract purchase agreements. These arrangements allowed dealers to increase interest rates to earn higher commission. Although banned in 2021, many customers say they were unaware at the time that the rate they were offered could directly affect how much commission a dealer received.
As more people understand how these arrangements worked, the number of potential car finance claims continues to rise.
For drivers who financed vehicles in recent years, Barclays’ decision to increase its fund may offer reassurance that complaints linked to mis-sold car finance are being recognised at senior levels within the banking sector.
Not every agreement will result in a successful car finance claim or PCP claim. However, many motorists have said they feel unsettled after learning how commission structures operated behind the scenes. Some are now checking old agreements, speaking to advisers or seeking guidance to determine whether car finance mis-selling may apply in their case.
The steady increase in car finance claims and PCP claims across the industry suggests that awareness of the car finance scandal is continuing to grow.
Barclays is one of several major lenders strengthening its financial buffer as the scale of potential redress becomes clearer. Industry analysts believe the overall cost of compensation linked to car finance mis-selling could reach into the billions across the UK, depending on how regulators proceed and how many consumers submit a car finance claim.
For banks, the situation is about more than numbers. It is also about public confidence. How lenders respond to the car finance scandal may shape how customers view the fairness and transparency of the financial system in the years ahead.
With £325 million now set aside, the natural question for many drivers is simple: what does this mean for me? If car finance claims continue to increase, Barclays and other lenders may have to strengthen their compensation funds again. Yet for most customers, the real concern is not the size of the provision, but whether they were treated fairly in the first place.
Car finance agreements are often signed on what should be a positive day. Picking up a new car is exciting. The paperwork is usually completed quickly, sometimes in a busy showroom, with attention focused on monthly payments and getting the keys. Few people expect to revisit those documents years later to examine commission structures or technical clauses.
Now, as the car finance scandal continues to unfold, many drivers are finding themselves pulling old agreements out of drawers or inboxes and trying to make sense of them. For some, it raises uncomfortable questions about whether mis-sold car finance may have played a part in the deal they accepted.
Anyone who believes they may have been affected, particularly through a PCP agreement, may wish to carefully review their documents and consider whether a car finance claim or PCP claim could be appropriate. For many, this process is not only about potential compensation. It is about reassurance, understanding and confidence that the agreement they entered into was transparent and fair.
__________