News 25 August 2026 | Andrew Franks |

The regulator said Woodville's failure highlights the potential losses consumers can face when investing through unregulated companies offering fixed returns.
Woodville raised capital from retail investors through unregulated loan notes before entering administration on 16 July 2026 [2]. Administrators currently believe more than £300 million may have been raised from investors [3].
The FCA is now urging consumers to check carefully who they are investing with and what protection they would have if the company fails.
A loan note or mini bond generally involves lending money to a company for a fixed period in exchange for interest.
Unlike a normal savings account with a regulated bank, repayment depends on the financial health of the company receiving the investment.
If that company cannot repay its debts, investors may recover only part of their original investment or potentially nothing at all.
The FCA describes these products as high risk and says they are generally unsuitable for ordinary retail investors.
The regulator said it continues to see consumers losing money through unregulated loan notes and mini bonds.
Woodville Consultants is one recent example.
The litigation funder raised money from investors before lending funds into legal claims, including car finance claims. Its returns therefore depended partly on the timing and value of recoveries from litigation.
Woodville entered administration after experiencing financial difficulties. The company's administrators are now investigating its finances, assets and relationships with third parties.
The collapse does not mean every loan note or mini bond is fraudulent. However, the FCA says consumers should recognise that products promising high fixed returns can carry substantial risk.
One of the FCA's central messages is that unusually high fixed returns should be treated as a warning sign rather than a guarantee.
The regulator says consumers should question how a business will generate enough money to repay both their capital and the promised interest.
It has also warned about promotions that describe investments as asset backed without clearly explaining what those assets are worth or who else may have a claim over them.
Other warning signs include pressure to invest quickly, unclear explanations of potential losses and unusually complicated arrangements involving several businesses.
The regulator is also warning consumers to understand who is being paid when an investment is promoted.
Some unregulated introducers receive substantial fees or commissions for referring investors to high risk products. Those costs can reduce the amount of an investor's money that actually reaches the underlying business.
The FCA says consumers should ask whether commissions or other fees are being paid, how much they are worth and how much of their original investment will actually be put to work.
The issue has particular relevance following Woodville's collapse.
The Times previously reported that some sales consultants promoting Woodville could receive commissions worth between 10% and 15% of money invested [4]. Some investors alleged that these payments were not disclosed to them. Administrators are examining how investor funds were used and what effect commissions may have had on the viability of the investments.
Those investigations remain ongoing.
Another concern raised by the FCA involves consumers being encouraged to classify themselves as sophisticated, experienced or high net worth investors.
Certain exemptions can allow high risk investments to be promoted to people who meet those criteria.
The regulator warns consumers not to tick these boxes simply because a promoter tells them to do so.
Self certification can affect the protections available when something goes wrong.
The FCA has called on the Government to review legislative exemptions that can allow some high risk investments to be promoted outside the normal regulatory framework.
Protection can be significantly more limited when dealing with an unregulated investment.
The FCA says investors in loan notes or mini bonds are unlikely to be able to take a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service or recover losses through the Financial Services Compensation Scheme unless they dealt with an authorised person and the complaint concerns a regulated activity.
This means consumers should establish exactly which company they are investing with and whether that business has FCA permission for the activity involved.
The FCA recommends using its Firm Checker before committing money.
Woodville's collapse attracted attention because part of its business involved funding law firms pursuing consumer litigation, including claims connected to the wider car finance scandal.
However, the position of Woodville's investors should be kept separate from that of motorists pursuing a car finance claim.
Woodville was providing litigation funding. It was not the lender responsible for the consumer's original finance agreement.
Its administration therefore does not determine whether someone experienced car finance mis-selling or whether an individual agreement could qualify for car finance compensation or car finance refund.
The same distinction applies to PCP claims and other PCP refund or PCP finance claims relating to historic motor finance agreements.
It has also referred cases to law enforcement agencies where further investigation may be appropriate.
The FCA acknowledges that unregulated investments can be difficult to police, particularly where businesses operate overseas or structure promotions to rely on exemptions.
It says banks, payment companies, lawyers, accountants, auditors and other organisations involved in distributing or funding high risk investments should report suspicious activity.
Before investing in a loan note or mini bond, consumers should understand the company receiving their money, how the promised returns will be generated and what would happen if the business fails.
They should also check whether the firm is FCA authorised for the relevant activity and understand whether Financial Ombudsman or FSCS protection would apply.
Woodville's collapse has now become part of the FCA's wider warning about the risks of these products.
For motorists with mis-sold car finance claims, however, the central point remains different. The failure of a litigation funder does not itself determine whether their underlying complaint is valid or whether compensation may ultimately be due.
_________