Guide 29 December 2025 | Chris Roy |

Hidden fees sit quietly behind many of the mis-sold car finance UK stories now coming to light. For years, drivers signed PCP agreements believing the monthly payment told them everything they needed to know. The showroom felt professional. The paperwork looked standard. The salesperson often said things like “this is the usual package” or “this is what most people go for”. The whole process felt familiar, almost routine, so most people felt comfortable signing.
Only later did many drivers realise that extra costs had been built into those agreements in ways that were never properly explained. Some fees were tucked into the interest rate. Others appeared as admin or documentation charges with no real explanation. Some were presented as routine when they did not relate to any meaningful extra service at all. These hidden costs often made agreements significantly more expensive than customers expected, even when they thought they were choosing the most sensible and affordable option.
This guide takes you through how hidden fees worked in practice, why they mattered and how they fed into the wider car finance scandal. If you want a broader view of the patterns behind mis-selling, What a typical mis-sold PCP agreement looks like is a helpful starting point. This article builds on that and looks specifically at hidden or poorly explained fees, and how they increased costs for millions of UK drivers.
A hidden fee is not always something that looks suspicious on paper. It does not have to be buried in tiny print. More often, it is something that sits quietly inside the interest rate or appears as a generic line on the agreement that nobody talks about in the conversation. Sometimes it is introduced in such a relaxed, off-hand way that customers assume it must be mandatory and feel uncomfortable questioning it.
A fee becomes “hidden” when things like this happen.
The problem is not just the amount being charged. The deeper issue is the lack of transparency. You were not given the full information needed to understand the true financial impact of the agreement. That is why hidden fees now appear in so many car finance claims and why so many people are taking a fresh look at older PCP agreements with a more informed eye.
PCP agreements look simple on the surface. In reality, several moving parts work together at the same time. The deposit, monthly payment, balloon payment, mileage rules and interest rate all interact. That structure gave dealerships and lenders several different places to add costs without explaining them clearly.
Below are the main types of hidden fees that show up again and again in PCP finance across the UK.
Undisclosed commission is one of the most serious issues in pcp mis-selling. Many dealerships received commission from lenders. What was rarely explained is how that commission worked or how it influenced the rate the customer was offered.
In many cases, the dealership earned more when they set a higher interest rate within an allowed range. The customer believed the rate reflected their personal credit situation. In reality, the rate was sometimes lifted to generate more income for the dealer, not because the customer was riskier.
This extra commission acted as a hidden cost. It did not appear as a clear fee on the page. Instead, it sat inside the interest rate and increased the total amount repaid over the life of the agreement. That is why undisclosed commission now sits at the heart of many PCP claims and why it is such a strong focus in reviews of mis-sold car finance.
Documentation fees often appeared towards the end of the paperwork, sometimes described as processing or document preparation charges. Many customers were told these were standard, or they were mentioned so briefly that they did not feel like something you could question. Some customers only discovered later that other buyers were not charged the same fee, even when they bought a similar car from the same dealer.
Because the fee was not clearly described, customers were effectively denied a real choice. They were not guided to decide whether it felt fair or whether they were willing to pay it. They were simply expected to accept it as part of the process.
Admin fees worked in a very similar way. They were often presented as part of the lender’s process or the dealer’s internal costs. In reality, the actual administrative work might have been minimal or already covered by the margin in the finance.
These fees usually appeared at a late stage, once you had spent time choosing the car, discussing options and mentally committing to the deal. At that point, many people did not feel comfortable pushing back over an extra line or two on the agreement. The lack of clarity around admin fees turned them into yet another hidden cost that quietly inflated the price of the contract.
Interest uplifts are one of the most expensive forms of hidden cost. They occur when the dealership increases the interest rate above the base rate offered by the lender. This uplift does not appear as a separate fee. Instead, it changes your monthly payment and increases the total amount repayable over the term.
Many customers left the dealership believing the interest rate matched their credit score or their personal circumstances. Only later did they learn that the uplift had been added to support the dealer’s commission structure. That means they paid more than they needed to, not because of their risk level, but because of how the deal was set up behind the scenes.
For this reason, interest uplifts are now one of the clearest signs associated with mis-sold car finance UK and a frequent feature in modern car finance claims and complaints.
Even when you remove insurance-based products, many other add-ons created hidden fees. Common examples include.
Some customers were left with the impression that these add-ons were required for the finance to go through. Others thought they were part of a standard package that came with the car. In many cases, they were optional extras that were not clearly presented as a choice. The cost was sometimes rolled into the finance, so customers never saw a separate headline price.
An add-on becomes a hidden fee when the price is inflated, not explained properly or added without clear consent. It is not always that the product itself has no value. The problem is that customers were not given the information or freedom to decide whether it was worth paying for, or whether they would prefer to say no.
Early settlement charges affected customers who wanted to end the agreement before the full term. Many people assumed they could leave the contract without major penalties. They only discovered otherwise when they tried to switch cars, refinance or clear the balance early.
If settlement rules and charges were not clearly explained at the beginning, they are effectively hidden. They restrict your flexibility in ways you did not understand when you signed. That can cause real financial pressure, especially where customers were encouraged to believe a PCP agreement was flexible and easy to exit, when in reality the costs for doing so were significant.
Commission is at the centre of many mis-sold car finance complaints. It does not always appear as a visible line on the agreement, yet it can heavily shape the price you pay.
In many arrangements, the dealership and the lender agreed a structure where the dealer could influence the interest rate within a certain band. The higher the rate, the more commission the dealer earned. Customers were almost never told this. Instead, they were told the rate was “typical”, “standard for this model” or “the best rate available”. Without clear information about commission, customers had no way of knowing that their rate might have been deliberately set higher than necessary.
This lack of transparency is one of the reasons the FCA has focused so strongly on the car finance scandal and why so many customers are now revisiting older agreements to see if they were treated fairly.
The same issue appears outside traditional dealerships as well. Brokers and car supermarkets often used very similar commission structures, which is why many drivers now ask Can I claim if I bought my car from a broker or car supermarket? when they begin exploring possible mis-selling and whether a car finance claim might apply to them.
Add-ons become a concern when they are not sold openly and clearly. Many of the products mentioned earlier can be useful for some drivers in certain situations. The problem is not simply that these products exist. The real concern is how they were presented.
Add-ons often turned into hidden fees when things like this happened.
When you do not realise you have a choice, or you cannot see a clear price, it becomes almost impossible to make a fair decision. That is how add-ons move from being optional extras into hidden costs that quietly increase the overall price of the agreement.
For many people, hidden fees only become visible when they go back over their agreement with more information and more distance from the original sale. Some notice that the numbers on the paperwork do not match what they remember being told. Others start asking questions after seeing news coverage or after learning more about what is mis-sold car finance, then decide to dig out old paperwork or check their bank records.
There are a few main ways that hidden fees tend to come to light.
A proper breakdown of your payments can reveal a lot more than just the monthly figure. It can show.
If you no longer have the full agreement, you can still begin this process by looking at your payment history. Bank statements are often a very useful starting point. The guide Are bank statements enough evidence for a car finance claim? sets out how lenders can use internal data and basic payment information to fill the gaps when customers no longer have every document to hand.
When you make a car finance claim, the lender should explain how the agreement was structured. That includes how the interest rate was set, whether commission was involved and which fees were included. It is often at this stage that previously hidden elements become clear because the lender has to describe the structure of the deal in a more transparent way.
The FCA has identified several consistent patterns in its work on mis-sold car finance UK, including.
These findings help people recognise similar features in their own agreements, even if they did not notice anything unusual at the time of sale. The FCA is finalising which groups should be included. This covers agreements taken out between 6 April 2007 and 1 November 2024 [1]. The FCA consultation taking place from October until 12 December 2025 [2]. This consultation is not a simple review. It is the process that will decide exactly how lenders must handle historic FCA car finance claims.
Oliver bought a car in 2017. The salesperson told him the interest rate reflected his credit history. He trusted that explanation and focused on whether the monthly payment seemed manageable in his budget. Several years later, he started reading about car finance claims and decided to look at his agreement more closely. He discovered that the dealer had increased the interest rate above the lender’s base rate to generate extra commission. Over the full term, this uplift meant Oliver paid more than £2,000 extra. That additional cost had never been clearly explained or justified.
Sarah financed a car in 2019. During the sale, the monthly payment was the main focus of the conversation. Nobody took her line by line through the fees on the agreement. When she reviewed her paperwork a few years later, she noticed both a documentation fee and an admin fee listed in the contract. She later learned that other customers buying the same model from the same location did not always pay those charges. That inconsistency raised serious questions in her mind about whether her agreement had really been presented in a fair and transparent way.
If you are wondering whether your agreement might contain hidden fees, it can help to look for familiar patterns and small details that do not quite add up. Warning signs can include.
If any of these points sound familiar, your agreement may show signs of mis-sold car finance and could be worth a closer look.
Hidden fees can influence how a lender looks at your complaint. If a cost was added without proper explanation, or if a commission structure encouraged a higher rate than you might otherwise have received, the lender may need to consider whether that created an unfair outcome for you.
It is important to stay realistic. A PCP claim is always assessed on its individual facts. Not every agreement that includes extra fees or add-ons will lead to compensation. The aim here is not to promise a particular result, but to explain why regulators and lenders now treat hidden fees as a serious warning sign that something may have gone wrong in the original sale.
No. You can still take meaningful steps even if you no longer have every document. Lenders can often trace agreements using partial information such as payment history, vehicle details or old email records. If you are unsure where to start, the guide Are bank statements enough evidence for a car finance claim? explains how simple records like bank statements can help.
No. Hidden fees are just one part of the picture. Concerns about commission, affordability, the way the interest rate was explained or how the balloon payment was described can all suggest possible mis-selling. For a broader view of the patterns involved in mis-sold car finance, What a typical mis-sold PCP agreement looks like can help you spot other features that may apply to your situation.
Yes. Many brokers and car supermarkets used similar commission-based models to traditional dealerships. That is why so many drivers now ask Can I claim if I bought my car from a broker or car supermarket? when they start revisiting older agreements and thinking about making a car finance claim.
In many cases, yes. Commission-driven interest uplifts in particular can add a significant amount over the life of a PCP agreement, especially where the term is long and the finance amount is relatively high.
No. Even if you have had several PCP agreements over many years, lenders usually hold detailed internal records and can trace each one. You may only need to provide basic information, such as approximate dates or payment amounts, to help them identify the right accounts and consider potential PCP claims linked to those agreements.
Hidden fees played an important role in many PCP agreements across the UK. They influenced interest rates, increased monthly payments and introduced charges that customers were never given a fair chance to understand or question. These costs form a significant part of the wider story of mis-sold car finance and continue to shape ongoing reviews by lenders, regulators and consumers.
If you suspect your agreement may contain hidden or unclear fees, taking a small first step can help you understand where you stand. Even limited information can be enough for a lender to begin reviewing your case and to look at whether a car finance claim may be appropriate in your circumstances.
Clear, honest information gives you control. Understanding how hidden fees worked helps you see whether your agreement may have been affected and whether exploring your options around mis-sold car finance is a step that could give you greater clarity and peace of mind.
_________