Updated: 21 August 2026

Originally Published: 26 March 2025

Quick Answer

If you had CA Auto Finance for an eligible vehicle finance agreement, you could fall within the FCA's motor finance redress scheme if the relevant criteria are met.

The position has changed significantly since this guide was published in April 2026. CA Auto Finance UK Limited is one of four parties challenging the lawfulness of the FCA scheme [1], and the Upper Tribunal partially suspended elements of it in July.

The challenges will be heard by the Upper Tribunal on either 14-18 December 2026 or 16-26 February 2027. Until the end of the legal process, lenders do not need to calculate or pay compensation under the suspended parts of the scheme.

The challenge doesn't determine whether an individual CA Auto Finance claim is eligible. Consumers can still complain to their lender while the proceedings continue.

CA Auto Finance in 2026: How the Position Has Changed

The story has moved quickly since the previous version of this guide.

• 30 March 2026: The FCA introduced its industry wide motor finance consumer redress scheme for customers treated unfairly between 2007 and 2024.
• April 2026: The previous version of this guide was published.
• April and May 2026: Legal challenges were brought against the FCA scheme, including a challenge from CA Auto Finance UK Limited.
• 1 July 2026: The Upper Tribunal ordered a partial suspension of elements of the scheme.
• August 2026: Firms can continue preparatory work and progress complaints where permitted, but compensation calculations and payments under suspended provisions remain affected.
• 14 to 18 December 2026 or 16 to 26 February 2027: The Upper Tribunal will hear the legal challenges during one of these two periods.

The FCA originally expected millions of claims to be settled during 2026. Its July update confirms that the legal proceedings have interrupted that timetable.

That distinction is important for anyone following FCA car finance developments.

The FCA originally anticipated millions of claims to be settled in 2026. The following litigation and partial suspension of the scheme threw that timeline into disarray. For those keeping track of FCA car finance, the main thing to understand is that the scheme has not been suspended, but the operation of it is on hold temporarily.

Introduction

A CA Auto Finance claim now has an unusual context.

CA Auto Finance UK Ltd isn't simply a lender whose historic agreements may fall within the FCA's motor finance scheme. It is also directly challenging elements of that scheme before the Upper Tribunal.

Those are separate issues.

The legal challenge doesn't establish whether an individual agreement involved car finance mis-selling. Likewise, having CA car finance doesn't automatically mean compensation is due.

The wider car finance scandal has brought scrutiny to historic commission and commercial arrangements across the motor finance market. For someone who arranged CA Auto car finance, the relevant questions concern how the agreement was structured, what was disclosed and whether the applicable FCA requirements for redress are met.

This guide explains those issues alongside the latest position on CA Auto Finance complaints, the Upper Tribunal proceedings and compensation timing.

What Could Make a CA Auto Finance Agreement Relevant?

For many customers, CA Finance was arranged through a dealership. Behind the vehicle purchase could be a separate commercial relationship between the dealer or broker and finance provider.

Commission itself doesn't prove mis-sold car finance.

The FCA scheme focuses on specified arrangements and whether the relevant requirements for redress are met. These include discretionary commission arrangements, high commission arrangements and certain tied relationships between lenders and brokers.

A potential car finance claim therefore concerns how the finance was arranged rather than whether the customer was satisfied with the vehicle.

CA Auto Finance Discretionary Commission

CA Auto Finance discretionary commission refers to a discretionary commission arrangement, commonly known as a DCA.

Under this historic model, a broker could have discretion over the interest rate in a way that affected the commission received. This created a potential financial incentive connected with the customer's rate.

The FCA banned DCAs in motor finance in 2021 [2]. For an older CA Auto Finance claim, the relevant questions include whether a DCA applied, what was disclosed and whether the agreement meets the scheme's requirements.

High Commission Arrangements

The FCA scheme also covers certain high commission arrangements.

Under the final rules, the relevant threshold involves commission representing at least 39% of the total charge for credit and 10% of the total amount of credit [3].

This means car finance mis selling under the scheme isn't limited to DCA cases. Meeting the commission threshold also doesn't automatically determine whether compensation is due.

Tied Arrangements

Certain contractual relationships between lenders and brokers can also be relevant.

A tied arrangement can involve a broker being required to introduce customers exclusively to one lender or give that lender the first opportunity to provide finance.

Being shown only one finance option doesn't establish mis sold car finance by itself. The assessment concerns the contractual relationship and the other requirements within the FCA scheme.

Could You Have a CA Auto Finance Claim?

Not every CA Auto Finance agreement will qualify for redress.

A CA Auto Finance claim needs to meet the FCA's scheme conditions and involve at least one relevant arrangement. The assessment can include the agreement date, type of finance, commission paid to the broker, applicable credit limits and whether previous redress has already been accepted.

Where a relevant arrangement is identified, the scheme then considers matters including disclosure, unfairness and financial loss.

Paying off the finance, settling early or no longer owning the vehicle doesn't by itself establish whether an older CA Auto car finance agreement qualifies.

Car finance claims should therefore be assessed against the agreement and FCA rules rather than assumptions based on the lender, vehicle or interest rate.

When Might a CA Auto Finance Agreement Be Ineligible?

Not every historic agreement falls within the scheme.

A CA car finance agreement may be outside its scope where it doesn't meet the FCA's definition of a scheme case, no qualifying commission was payable, no relevant arrangement existed or another applicable scheme condition isn't satisfied.

The rules also contain technical conditions concerning matters such as agreement dates, credit amounts, cancelled agreements and previous settlements.

This is why a PCP claim isn't automatically eligible simply because PCP was used.

The partial suspension also doesn't prevent every negative decision. FCA guidance confirms that some consumers who aren't owed compensation can still be told so while other parts of the scheme remain suspended.

Why Is CA Auto Finance UK Challenging the FCA Scheme?

This is where the CA Auto Finance story becomes different from almost every other lender pillar.

CA Auto Finance UK Limited isn't simply subject to the motor finance redress scheme.

It is one of the parties challenging its lawfulness.

The FCA confirms that the four challengers are CA Auto Finance UK Limited, Consumer Voice Limited, Mercedes Benz Financial Services UK Limited and Volkswagen Financial Services UK Limited. The challenges are being heard by the Upper Tribunal's Tax and Chancery Chamber.

The existence of the challenge shouldn't be interpreted as evidence for or against an individual CA Auto Finance claim.

These are different questions.

A customer's complaint concerns what happened under their finance agreement.

CA Auto Finance UK's legal proceedings concern whether elements of the FCA's industry wide rules are lawful.

What Is Being Challenged?

The challenges are broader than a disagreement about how much car finance compensation should be paid.

The FCA says the four applicants have challenged different parts of the rules, with some grounds overlapping and others being specific to individual applicants. Collectively, the challenges concern all three types of relevant arrangement covered by the scheme: discretionary commission, high commission and tied arrangements.

Issues raised across the proceedings include:

• whether the FCA had the necessary power to make aspects of the rules
• how the scheme applies to agreements entered into before 1 April 2014
• the FCA's treatment of limitation periods
• how unfair relationships and resulting losses are determined
• the assumptions lenders must make when assessing certain agreements
• how redress is calculated
• the compensatory interest applied to redress

This matters because the Upper Tribunal isn't being asked merely to settle a dispute involving CA Finance.

Its eventual decision could affect how parts of the industry wide scheme operate.

The FCA has said it will defend the scheme as lawful and considers an industry wide approach the quickest and most cost effective way of resolving the issue.

Until the Tribunal decides the challenges, neither side's position should be presented as settled law.

Does CA Auto Finance UK's Challenge Stop You Making a Complaint?

No.

The FCA's current advice is that consumers who have concerns should complain directly to their lender.

That remains the case despite the legal proceedings.

This distinction is particularly important for someone considering a CA Auto Finance claim.

The legal challenge affects how parts of the redress scheme can operate. It doesn't mean CA Auto Finance complaints have been prohibited or that consumers need to wait until the Upper Tribunal hearing before contacting their lender.

Nor does making a complaint mean compensation is guaranteed.

A complaint establishes that you want the agreement considered. Whether it ultimately results in a car finance refund or other redress depends on the scheme rules that apply once the legal position is resolved.

What Does the Partial Suspension Mean for CA Auto Finance Customers?

The Upper Tribunal hasn't suspended the entire scheme.

Its July order temporarily suspended specified provisions while the legal challenges proceed [4]. Firms can continue preparing for the scheme and progress complaints as far as possible. However, lenders don't currently have to calculate or pay compensation under the suspended parts.

Consumers can still make CA Auto Finance complaints. The FCA currently recommends complaining to your lender if you have concerns about historic motor finance commission.

Making a complaint doesn't guarantee a car finance refund or other compensation. It allows the agreement to be considered through the applicable process.

When Will the Upper Tribunal Hear the Challenges?

The Upper Tribunal will hear the legal challenges either between 14 and 18 December 2026 or between 16 and 26 February 2027.

Which hearing window applies will depend on procedural developments, including whether further expert opinion or disclosure is required.

A judgment is expected in the months following the hearing. The outcome could affect how elements of the FCA's motor finance redress scheme operate and the timetable for compensation.

What Happened to Payouts 2026?

When the FCA launched its final scheme in March [5], it expected millions of claims to be settled during 2026 and the vast majority by the end of 2027.

The subsequent legal challenges overtook that timetable.

The FCA now states that lenders don't need to calculate or pay compensation under the suspended parts of the scheme until the legal process concludes.

Motorists searching for payouts 2026 may therefore encounter information based on the position before the Upper Tribunal's July order.

There is currently no reliable individual payment date for a CA Auto Finance claim, PCP claim or other eligible car finance claim.

The clearer distinction for August 2026 is:

Complaints can continue. Compensation timing remains subject to the legal proceedings.

How Could CA Auto Finance Compensation Work?

There isn't a standard amount of car finance compensation for a successful CA Auto Finance claim.

Under the FCA's final modelling, around 12.1 million agreements could be eligible across the wider motor finance market. Average redress is estimated at approximately £829 per eligible agreement [6]. The FCA estimates £7.5 billion in total redress based on 75% of eligible consumers participating.

That £829 figure isn't an estimate of what an individual CA Finance customer will receive.

The calculation depends on the circumstances of the agreement and the type of relevant arrangement identified. The FCA's methodology uses different approaches depending on the case.

This means two customers with similar vehicles or monthly repayments could have different outcomes.

Is Compensation the Same as a Car Finance Refund?

Not necessarily.

Terms such as car finance refund, PCP refund and PCP compensation claim are commonly used when discussing the car finance scandal, but they can give the impression that successful customers simply receive their finance payments back.

The FCA scheme doesn't work that way.

Redress is intended to compensate for loss associated with the relevant unfair relationship. The calculation depends on the circumstances and applicable methodology.

For someone considering a CA Auto Finance claim, the FCA's market wide average should therefore be treated as context rather than a personal compensation estimate.

Where Does PCP Car Finance Fit?

PCP car finance can fall within the FCA scheme, but having PCP doesn't itself establish car finance mis selling.

For PCP finance claims, the relevant questions concern what happened when the agreement was arranged. This can include commission, disclosure and the relationship between the lender and broker.

The same principle applies to a PCP claim, wider PCP claims and searches for PCP car claims.

Having an expensive PCP agreement doesn't prove that you had mis-sold PCP car finance. Equally, completing the agreement or no longer owning the vehicle doesn't necessarily prevent an eligible historic agreement from being considered.

The finance arrangement matters more than the product label.

How to Check an Older CA Auto Finance Agreement

You may remember the vehicle or dealership more clearly than the finance provider, particularly if the agreement ended several years ago.

Start with any information you still have, such as:

• the vehicle registration
• dealership or broker details
• approximate purchase date
• old emails or finance statements
• bank statements showing repayments
• correspondence referring to CA Auto Finance UK Ltd

You can also check your credit history through agencies such as TransUnion, Experian or Equifax. Depending on the age of the agreement, your credit file may help identify an older vehicle finance account or lender.

You don't need to reconstruct the entire agreement from memory.

The first objective is simply to identify the finance so its circumstances can be considered.

What Does a Car Finance Refund Check Tell You?

A car finance refund check isn't a compensation calculation.

It can help establish basic information about an older agreement, including the lender, approximate date and whether further assessment may be appropriate.

A PCP claim check serves a similar initial purpose where PCP was involved.

Neither confirms that you experienced mis sold car finance. Neither guarantees a car finance refund or compensation.

That distinction is particularly important while the Upper Tribunal proceedings remain unresolved.

What Can CA Auto Finance Customers Do While the Challenge Continues?

The legal challenge doesn't mean consumers have to wait before raising concerns.

The FCA says the complaint handling pause ended on 31 May 2026. It currently advises consumers who believe they may have paid too much because of commission arrangements to complain to their lender. Complaints entirely outside the scheme should be handled in the usual way.

Consumers have several options.

Contact CA Auto Finance Directly

You can raise CA Auto Finance complaints with the lender yourself.

The FCA scheme is free for consumers to use. You don't need professional representation simply to make a complaint.

Keep copies of correspondence and any information you have about the vehicle, dealership and finance agreement.

Seek Independent Legal Advice

Some customers may prefer independent legal advice about their circumstances.

This may be appropriate where the issues extend beyond the standard FCA scheme or where individual legal questions arise.

Check the costs and funding arrangements before instructing a solicitor.

Use a Regulated Claims Management Company

Another option is an FCA regulated claims management company.

A finance claims expert may help identify agreements, organise information and manage correspondence.

Using professional representation doesn't change whether an agreement qualifies. The FCA has also warned consumers about misleading motor finance claims advertising and reminds customers that they can complain directly without paying a CMC or law firm.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is CA Auto Finance UK challenging the FCA scheme?

CA Auto Finance UK Limited is one of four parties challenging the lawfulness of elements of the motor finance redress scheme.

The proceedings concern the regulatory framework rather than whether any particular customer's agreement qualifies. Until the Upper Tribunal rules, the challenge shouldn't be treated as having succeeded or failed.

Does the legal challenge stop me making a CA Auto Finance complaint?

No.

The FCA says consumers can still complain to their lender. The general motor finance complaint handling pause ended on 31 May 2026.

Making a complaint doesn't guarantee compensation. It allows the relevant agreement to enter the appropriate complaint or scheme process.

What does the partial suspension mean for CA Auto Finance claims?

The entire scheme hasn't been suspended.

Firms must continue complying with provisions that remain in force and can continue preparatory work. However, they currently don't have to calculate or pay redress under the suspended elements while the Upper Tribunal process continues.

When is the Upper Tribunal hearing?

The Tribunal has identified 14 to 18 December 2026 or 16 to 26 February 2027 as the possible hearing windows.

The final dates depend on procedural developments concerning further expert opinion or disclosure. Judgment is expected in the months following the hearing.

Can I claim if my CA Finance agreement has finished?

Possibly.  

An agreement does not need to be active to be covered by the FCA scheme. It depends on the agreement and the criteria of the relevant scheme whether you are eligible, not on whether you still own the vehicle or are making repayments.

Is it possible to trace an agreement without paperwork?

Possibly.  

Bank statements, emails, dealer records and credit reports may assist in identifying an historic CA car finance agreement.

A car finance refund check or PCP claim check may also assist in identifying basic details before an agreement is further examined.

Can I bring a PCP claim against CA Auto Finance?

Possibly if the agreement is in scope and meets the necessary criteria.

PCP claim is not automatically in scope simply because the agreement was PCP. The issue is how the finance was set up and if the criteria for redress are met.

Do I need a finance claims expert?

No.

You can complain directly to the lender without using a solicitor, CMC or finance claims expert. Professional representation is an option rather than an eligibility requirement.

A Claim and a Legal Challenge Can Exist at the Same Time

The position for CA Auto Finance customers is unusual.

An individual customer may be asking whether an historic CA Auto Finance claim falls within the FCA scheme. At the same time, CA Auto Finance UK is challenging elements of the regulatory framework used to assess motor finance redress.

One question doesn't answer the other.

The Upper Tribunal proceedings will help determine how the scheme operates. The circumstances of the individual finance agreement will determine whether a customer ultimately qualifies under the applicable rules.

For motorists concerned about car finance mis selling, the useful starting point is therefore identifying the agreement and understanding how it was arranged.

The timing of compensation remains uncertain.

The right to raise concerns hasn't disappeared.

_________

References:

1. CA Auto Finance UK Limited is one of four parties challenging the lawfulness of the FCA scheme - https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/information-firms-motor-finance-complaints/legal-challenge-documents
2. The FCA banned DCAs in motor finance in 2021 - https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-ban-motor-finance-discretionary-commission-models
3. Under the final rules, the relevant threshold involves commission representing at least 39% of the total charge for credit and 10% of the total amount of credit - https://handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/conred5/conred5s1
4. The Upper Tribunal July order temporarily suspended specified provisions while the legal challenges proceed - https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/motor-finance-scheme-partially-suspended
5. the FCA launched its final scheme in March - https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/policy-statements/ps26-3-motor-finance-consumer-redress-scheme
6. Average redress is estimated at approximately £829 per eligible agreement - https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/policy/ps26-3.pdf