In recent developments surrounding the car finance scandal, a new warning has emerged: lenders may face enormous challenges which are not merely legal and financial, but also operational, from the sheer complexity of handling widespread car finance claims and PCP claims. This comes from a data expert at FICO [1], who advises that tracing decade-old data and battling potential fraud will significantly strain the industry.

Data analytics firm FICO has sounded a clear alarm. Andrew Williams, FICO’s Senior Director for non-banking industries, emphasised that motor finance providers are about to face an unprecedented wave of claims. The main hurdles? Retrieving full data from as far back as 2007 when many commission structures were first put in place, as well as weeding out speculative or fraudulent claims. Lenders will need strong systems in place, particularly around automation and analytics, to identify the genuine claims as well as patterns of abuse.

These remarks arrive in the wake of landmark rulings by the UK Supreme Court [2] and proposed action by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The Supreme Court partially upheld earlier findings that some commission arrangements, particularly those disproportionately large or poorly disclosed, were unfair, though not all were deemed unlawful.

In response, the FCA announced plans to consult on an industry-wide redress scheme [3] for car finance claims: one that covers loans going back to 2007. The regulator estimates the total cost could be between £9 billion and £18 billion [4], and expects average payouts to be £950 per agreement [5]. The consultation is scheduled to launch in early October, with schemes rolled out in time for first payments in 2026.

This brings us to the heart of the car finance scandal: thousands of customers may have overpaid due to discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs), where dealers could increase interest rates and their own commission without properly informing buyers. Even non-discretionary arrangements may now be in scope if they involve insufficient disclosure.

But redress won’t be straightforward. As FICO warns, data from 2007 onwards may be incomplete or scattered across legacy systems. Lenders with advanced risk analytics and automation will have the upper hand in processing redress efficiently once the FCA sets the methodology such as whether payouts reimburse full commissions or apply interest.

This all underscores the importance of a clear, fair, and streamlined redress system. The FCA's principles to guide the design of the scheme are: fairness, timeliness, transparency, simplicity and certainty. Whether the scheme should be opt-in or opt-out is yet to be decided, but the regulator is minded to make the scheme compulsory for firms to inform all affected customers and to process claims on a standard basis.

For consumers, here’s what you should know:

• If you’ve already lodged a concern or suspect you might have been overcharged due to a lack of disclosure, there’s no need to act now.
• However, finance claims experts say it's wise to prepare: gather any documents, loan agreements, or commission notices from your car finance deal going back to 2007.
• As FCA themselves say, sometimes the simpler option and direct route is the best.

For readers seeking more insight, a great starting point is the detailed guide to the car finance scandal by Reclaim247. It explains both the broader context and provides practical information about car finance claims and PCP claims, helping you understand whether you might have a valid case and how to proceed. Feel free to explore more on car finance claims, PCP claims, and a full breakdown of the car finance scandal. Additionally, if you're looking for latest updates on car finance claims in the UK, that guide is invaluable.

Why This Matters

This unfolding car finance scandal is not merely a courtroom saga; it reflects deeper systemic failings in consumer finance wherein commercial pressures, opaque commission structures, and technological neglect are included. Consumers trust the FCA to steer redress, with more consumers showing significantly stronger confidence in the regulator than in banks themselves.

Yet the path ahead requires both regulatory clarity and industry readiness. Banks must urgently modernise data systems and introduce fraud-detection safeguards. FICO’s insights highlight that traditional case-by-case processing simply won’t scale: not within the tight timeframe and high public scrutiny this redress process now faces.

In the end, the future of the motor finance market and the reputation of all financial services with the public depends on a redress process that is perceived to be fair, efficient and beyond manipulation. This scandal could yet be a watershed moment for the regulation and delivery of consumer credit.

__________

1. data expert at FICO advises that tracing decade-old data and battling potential fraud will significantly strain the industry - https://www.am-online.com/news/data-expert-fico-warns-of-data-and-fraud-challenges-in-motor-finance-redress
2. landmark rulings by the UK Supreme Court - https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/uksc_2024_0157_0158_0159_judgment_2bb00f4f49.pdf
3. FCA to consult on an industry-wide redress scheme - https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-consult-motor-finance-compensation-scheme
4. compensation scheme will likely fall between £9 billion and £18 billion - https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/uks-fca-proposes-9-billion-18-billion-pound-redress-scheme-motor-finance-claims-2025-08-03/
5. average payouts to be £950 per agreement - https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/aug/04/who-will-get-car-loan-payout-how-much-regulator